A. A permittee shall cooperate with other wireless communications services providers in co-locating additional antenna on support structures and/or on existing buildings and sites; provided, said proposed co-locatees have received a permit for such use at said site from the town. A permittee shall allow other providers to co-locate and share the permitted site, provided such shared use does not give rise to a substantial technical level impairment of the permitted use (as opposed to a competitive conflict or financial burden). In the event a dispute arises as to whether a permittee has exercised good faith in accommodating a new applicant, the town may require a third party technical study at the expense of the permittee. Failure to comply with this provision may result in a revocation of the permit.

B. A signed statement indicating that the applicant agrees to allow for the potential co-location of additional WCF equipment by other providers on the applicant's structure or within the same site location shall be submitted by the applicant as part of the permit application. If an applicant contends that future co-location is not possible on their site, they must submit a technical study documenting why.

C. Co-location requirements shall not apply to WCFs located on structures in public rights-of-way. There shall be no more than one WCF located on an existing structure in a public right-of-way. Existing structures in public rights-of-way are not eligible for co-location of additional WCF equipment. (Ord. 00-395 §9, 2000)